vibecodingnav
中/EN
Benchmarks/nextjs-evals

Next.js Agent Evals

2026-09-25 · Framework eval · pass@4 · 2026-09-25

What it measures
Models do real Next.js tasks. The current board is the agents that are still rerun. The older Previously measured rows are not folded into this column.
How
The official Vercel / Next.js evals. Success is pass@4: one pass in four attempts counts. The baseline has no AGENTS.md. The other arm gets the bundled Next.js docs. The columns stay separate.
What the score means
The percent is pass@4 on one task set. Rank follows the no-AGENTS.md baseline and keeps the source page's order. The change is with AGENTS.md minus baseline.
Caveats
Vercel writes the tasks and grades them. This measures a model together with Next.js, not one framework against another. The front sits above 90%, near the ceiling. Pixel Canary (OpenCode) is 5th on the source page, 90% baseline and 97% with AGENTS.md, cost N/A. This site has no vendor identity for that model, so it has no model page. Its rank stays the source rank.
Updates
The source page dates the last run 2026-09-25. This page synced the current board on 2026-10-10 and left out Previously measured.

Baseline board

#ModelBaselineCost per run
1Claude Opus 5.5
high · Claude Code
97.0$0.234
2GPT 6 Sol
high · Codex
97.0$0.244
3Claude Fable 5.1
high · Claude Code
97.0$0.722
4Grok 4.7
OpenCode
94.0$0.109
6Gemini 3.8 Flash
OpenCode
90.0$0.605
7GPT-6 Astra
high · Codex
90.0$0.891
8Kimi K3
OpenCode
84.0$0.281
9GLM 5.2
OpenCode
81.0$0.152
10Claude Sonnet 5
Claude Code
81.0$0.386
11Cursor Composer 2.5
Cursor
81.0$0.062
12MiniMax M3
OpenCode
81.0$0.053
13GPT 6 Luna
high · Codex
77.0$0.011
14Kimi K2.7 Code
OpenCode
74.0$0.139

Used by